A huge Six Nations change has sparked backlash from fans and pundits

World Rugby has ignited significant controversy following its announcement of a global trial for 20-minute red cards.

The governing body confirmed the trial on Tuesday, part of a series of proposals aimed at “enhancing both the fan and player experience.” Notably, this new rule is set to feature in next year’s Six Nations tournament.

Join our Breaking News and Top Stories WhatsApp community for all the latest news direct to your phone.

Mixed Reactions from the Rugby Community

While some of the proposed changes, such as reducing the time allowed for conversions and streamlining scrums and lineouts, have garnered positive feedback, the 20-minute red card law has been met with widespread criticism from fans, players, and former referees.

Under this new rule, a team would be reduced to 14 players for just 20 minutes, after which the sent-off player could be replaced. Advocates argue that the intent is to penalize the individual offender without unduly punishing the team. However, many in the rugby community believe this approach could undermine the integrity of the game.

Criticism from Former Officials

Former test referee Nigel Owens expressed his disapproval of the proposed change in a recent column for WalesOnline, emphasizing that the 20-minute red card will not effectively address issues related to foul play.

"As far as the 20-minute red card idea is concerned, I'm not a fan," Owens stated. "If someone on the pitch has committed a red card offence, they should be given a red card that sees them sin-binned for the rest of the game. Simple as that."

Player Welfare Concerns

Progressive Rugby, an organization focused on making head contact less prevalent in the sport, also condemned the proposal. They previously criticized SANZAAR for trialing similar rules during this year’s Rugby Championship.

Their statement was clear: "Staggeringly bad look from SANZAAR in light of recent litigation; firmly prioritises spectacle over player welfare; two fingers up at World Rugby; removes incentive to address behaviours and tackle technique. Deeply disappointing."

Will World Rugby Listen?

Despite the backlash, history suggests that World Rugby may proceed with the trial regardless of public sentiment. Critics fear that the governing body will continue to enforce laws under the pretext of fulfilling fan demands, even amidst widespread dissatisfaction.

As the sport evolves, the question remains: will rugby continue to adapt its rules at the expense of its core values?

The Three Richest Couples in World Rugby

Rugby has produced some of the most iconic athletes in the sporting world, but for a select few, success on the pitch has also led to immense wealth off it.

From high-profile marriages to lucrative endorsements and television appearances, these rugby stars have built financial empires.

Here's a look at three couples who have combined their sporting legacies with fame and fortune, amassing millions along the way.

Mike and Zara Tindall – £20m

Mike Tindall is known not just for his rugby prowess but for his royal connections. As the husband of Zara Phillips, the granddaughter of Queen Elizabeth II, Tindall has become a prominent figure in British media.

Nicknamed "The Fridge" due to his imposing physique, Tindall was a stalwart on the rugby field, famously breaking his nose at least eight times over the course of his career. Since retiring from the sport, he's made a name for himself in the entertainment world, appearing on popular reality shows such as I'm a Celebrity… Get Me Out of HereBear Grylls: Mission SurviveThe JumpShark CageCelebrity Poker Club, and All-Star Poker Challenge.

Despite his success in sports and entertainment, Tindall's wealth has been largely bolstered by his royal ties, with his net worth estimated at £20 million, according to British media.

CONTINUES ON PAGE TWO


The post A huge Six Nations change has sparked backlash from fans and pundits appeared first on Ruck.

img

Top 5 Rugby

×